#87 – Nick Freitas – The Iced Coffee Hour
GO TO SPOTIFY
QUOTES:
I think there's a lot of truth in the fact that technological development has decreased the necessity for many things or removed certain challenges that used to be evident and gave us meaning and purpose. Going out and fighting for something, bringing in the crop, or protecting the family from the barbarian horde brought meaning and purpose.
Now, I will say this—I don't think it's a one-for-one exchange. I don't think you can trade meaning and purpose for simple dopamine hits. We see the effects of that. As much as we talk about the real consequences for someone just scrolling through TikTok or watching porn, their basic necessities for life—food, shelter, and entertainment—are met, yet people are miserable.
I haven’t watched cable in a while, but now that I am, every other ad is for some sort of pharmaceutical. It's shocking. If you look at young women and what they're saying, we have the highest diagnosis of mental illness among young women in recorded history.
When things become so easy, minor inconveniences now feel like earth-shattering trauma. I don’t think that’s healthy. A mindset that expects life to be difficult and understands that meaning and purpose come from overcoming challenges is essential. True joy and peace in the midst of the storm require work.
Consequences, to effectively promote positive or negative behavior, need to be immediate. They should be quick and strong enough to elicit an actual response.
A single mom once called me. She said, "You talk a lot about raising men and the importance of a male role model in a boy’s life. I'm a single mom, which means I don’t have the father there that I wish I did. What do I do?" I told her, "I was raised by a single mom. My dad was still involved in my life, but I only saw him three to four months a year—not as much as I would have liked. But he was a man I admired, and those few months went a long way. "You will need a positive male role model at some point in your son's life. He will face certain challenges, and they need to be age-appropriate, but he needs someone who will push him to explore, try, fight, fail, and get back up. He needs someone to say, 'Nobody needs your crying right now—we need to get the job done.' Not in an inappropriate way, but in a way that instills resilience." What do I mean by age-appropriate? I don't give my 19-year-old son the same challenges I gave him when he was seven. The other thing I tried to convey to her was that my mom did an excellent job as a single mother. When I was little, I needed security, love, and comfort. But as boys get older, they struggle to feel love apart from respect. Love without respect feels like pity. And if there's one thing men don’t want, it's to be pitied. So, as her son grows, one of the best things she can do is give him more responsibilities and challenges. Have him carry the groceries, walk on the street side when you’re together, and reward him when he acts as a protector or provider.
One of the greatest compliments my wife ever gave me was when she stopped me and said, "I need you to know that you have done an excellent job providing for this family. You make me feel safe." Brother, I’m telling you—that was the only compliment I needed for a year.
There is something to be said for overcoming challenges that require great mental and physical strain. Once a person realizes they can accomplish something—especially after failing a few times—it shifts their mindset. That shift, even if it happens over something small at 12 years old, influences other areas of life.
One of the most empowering things you can do is take responsibility for your actions—even when you're not responsible for your circumstances. There are two mindsets: an overcoming mentality and a victim mentality. I know incredibly wealthy, privileged people with a victim mentality. Their lives get worse because they constantly look for someone else to blame. I’ve also seen people who grew up in awful conditions, where they were truly not responsible for what happened to them, yet their mindset was, "How can I improve my situation?" That’s not to say people shouldn’t discuss or process their past. But their response should be, "What can I do differently?"
Once you take responsibility, what do you do next? I believe there are five key areas:
Spiritual – What you think about God matters. Whether you dismiss faith entirely or live by it, it provides an objective framework for truth and morality. A belief in right and wrong beyond personal desires is incredibly important.
Intellectual – Nothing stops you from reading books, watching podcasts, and learning from people you respect. Intelligence matters as much as strength.
Emotional – Emotional regulation is crucial. A man shouldn’t bottle up his emotions, but he also can’t be weepy all the time. There’s a difference between weakness and appropriate tenderness. My wife once told me, "I don’t need you to be weak—I need you to be tender." That struck me.
Physical – Regardless of your profession, physical fitness has intellectual and health benefits. If you want to protect and provide, you should be in shape to do so.
Professional – It has never been easier or cheaper to develop marketable skills. Social media and the internet can be used for good. The marketplace rewards those who create value for others.
If you focus on these five areas, regardless of your circumstances, you won’t be disappointed.
Even when something truly traumatic happens—something that isn't your fault—your mindset should be, "What can I do differently? How can I improve? How do I make sure this doesn’t happen again?"
Those are important questions because they shift your focus toward self-improvement instead of wasting time on things you can't change. This mindset fosters gratitude. When you actively improve your situation, you realize, "I’m grateful for the ability to do this."
The single greatest threat to the United States isn’t the CCP, Russia, or terrorism. Those are real threats, but they pale in comparison to the massive unelected bureaucracy that has accumulated an absurd amount of power and control.
The federal government is involved in countless things it was never intended to be. Not by force, but by financial coercion—telling states and individuals, "If you want your money back, you must sign onto this program."
How many times have I heard in state legislatures, "Nick, we can’t pass that—we might lose federal funds"? Oh, you mean the federal funds they took from us in the first place?
I no longer look at voting simply as Republican, Democrat, or Libertarian. I ask, "Who understands the massive threat the bureaucracy poses? Who understands that government should not micromanage our daily lives? Who is serious about stopping it?"
A government big enough to give you everything is big enough to take everything away.
Whenever you see something that seems incredibly stupid, ask yourself, "Who benefits?" I promise you, someone very smart designed it that way for a reason.
We’ve created a society where a significant portion of the population are net tax beneficiaries, not net taxpayers. Politicians create voting blocs by raising taxes on productive citizens to buy votes from those who aren’t contributing.
When my neighbor succeeds, I celebrate because it shows that if I make better decisions, I can succeed too. Or, I could say, "My neighbor has more than me—he must have done something wrong. Who’s the politician that will take from him and give to me?" Never doubt the power of that economic and political message.
People adopt the victim mentality because it feels good in the moment. But not everyone wants freedom. Some would trade it for a life without responsibility. The problem is, when you accept that deal, you need someone to take from others to provide for you. The only institution with the legal power to do that is the government.
It is not your civic duty to vote. It is your civic duty to know what the hell you’re voting for.
Zrzeczenie się Praw Własności i Klauzula Użycia Edukacyjnego
Prezentowane na tej platformie treści, w tym m.in. transkrybowane cytaty, nie są naszą własnością. Wszelkie prawa i własność do opublikowanych treści należą do oficjalnych autorów i twórców odpowiednich kanałów YouTube i Spotify, z których pochodzą te treści. Materiał ten jest udostępniany wyłącznie w celach edukacyjnych. Nie rościmy sobie żadnych praw własności ani autorstwa tych treści i uznajemy, że pozostają one własnością intelektualną ich odpowiednich właścicieli.